Why I really dislike Obama

Because not only is he a compulsive liar, Obama will lie about what others say to gain support for his position. Obama is a despicable person and poor excuse for a man!

President Obama: Ronald Reagan Would Want 'Buffett Rule' from Colin Sumner on Vimeo.

President Obama at a fundraiser (fundraising is what his focus is, and what he does best) in Dallas, Texas on Tuesday: "Now, this notion that folks are inherently selfish, that’s just not true. (BULL! This is his view and it is incorrect! Like it or not, 99% of all people look to take care of themselves and family 1^st. There is nothing wrong with that. You must be able to take care of yourself before you can help anyone else!) But you’ve got to ask them, right? (WHAT?? Obama/Government has to ask them? Ask them what? To contribute to charity? Take care of their ageing parents? To save and put their children through school? To obey our laws, including immigration?  Ask them what???)

People don’t voluntarily pay taxes. (Really? Why not? Are they selfish and just don’t wish to give away their hard earned money?) But if you ask, most wealthy folks here in Dallas or around the country, they’ll tell you, you know what, I want to make sure that I’m doing my share for America to succeed. (For the most part, if these people are wealthy they have created many jobs and it is those jobs and all citizens prosperity is what America needs to succeed!) But somebody has got to ask. (What??? Ask what? Ask if they want to pay more taxes? Anyone that wishes to, can pay as much as they want to the government, all they have to do is send the check. Asking is fine, adding a tax with the threat of the IRS behind it, is not asking, that is demanding!)

"Now, some Republicans in Congress, they’re already dusting off the old -- their old records. (There he goes again, attack the Republicans. Yep, no politics as usual, he is not a divider, he is the Nobel peace prize winning great uniting guy huh?)  “That’s class warfare.” Let me tell you something, 26 years ago -- some of you may have seen this on television, clips have been circulating -- 26 years ago, another President said that some of these tax loopholes, and I quote, “made it possible for millionaires to pay nothing while a bus driver was paying 10 percent of his salary, and that’s crazy. It’s time we stopped it.” That was 26 years ago. You know the name of that President? Ronald Reagan. (yes and he was correct)

"So was that class warfare? (NO, he closed loop holes, just like he said, but did not discourage investment or savings) By the way, taxes are much lower now than they ever were when Ronald Reagan was President. I know a lot of folks have short memories, but I don’t remember Republicans accusing Ronald Reagan of being a socialist (Your tax policy is not what makes you a socialist. It is your redistribution agenda that is un-American, that and your big government/cradle to grave mentality that is socialistic Your agenda MUST and WILL be defeated in 2012)  -- (laughter) (fools follow fools and birds of a feather flock together) -- or engaging in class warfare, because he thought that everybody should do their fair share." (YOU Sir are an A..hole to make this statement. I have never heard, nor have you…President Reagan refer to “their fair share”. To put words or thoughts into a man’s mouth that he would never have said, words that would go against all the man stood for, all  in an effort to make yourself look like the respectable man that Ronald Reagan was. You Sir are despicable, low life political scum…Have I made my opinion of Obama clear?)

Perhaps you should look at the chart below and find a way to tax people that are not paying taxes now or those that are far below the average. Those are the people that have no stake in America s growth. They are the people who vote for you so you can take care of them. Where is their fair share? Why do the only take, generation after generation? Is this the class you wish to grow?

You want fair? Do away with employer with holdings and make everyone write a check at the end of the year for the Taxes they owe! 

Tax refunds are the government SCAM to make people feel good about taxes!

Yep, thought that is what you were thinking about my comments to your speech.

Mad American

10 Poorest Cities in America, thanks to Democrates!

Poorest Cities in America and how did it happen and Do you want to join them?       City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level 1. Detroit , MI 32.5% 2. Buffalo , NY 29.9% 3. Cincinnati , OH 27.8% 4. Cleveland , OH 27.0% 5. Miami , FL 26.9% 5. St. Louis , MO 26.8% 7. El Paso , TX 26.4% 8. Milwaukee , WI 26.2% 9. Philadelphia , PA 25.1% 10. Newark , NJ Below is how you can join the racks of the worst!  24.2%  U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007  What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty rate all have in common?  Detroit, MI    (1st on the poverty rate list)    hasn't  elected a Republican mayor    since 1961 Buffalo, NY (2nd)    hasn't elected one since 1954 Cincinnati, OH - (3rd)...   since 1984 Cleveland, OH - (4th)...  since 1989 Miami, FL - (5th)    has never  had a Republican mayor St. Louis, MO - (6th)...   since 1949 El Paso, TX - (7th)    has never had a Republican mayor Milwaukee , WI - (8th)...   since 1908 Philadelphia, PA - (9th)...   since 1952 Newark, NJ - (10th)...   since 1907. Einstein once said,    'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again    and expecting different results.' It is the poor who habitually elect Democrats ....   yet they are still  POOR.  "You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.    You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.    You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.    You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man    by inciting class hatred.    You cannot build character and courage    by taking away people's initiative and independence.    You cannot help people permanently by doing for them,    what they could and should do for themselves."   Abraham Lincoln Understand?  Obama, Unions, Democrats and Liberals sure don't!

Health Care and has anyone in the Obama administration had a job?

An "Investor's Business Daily" article provided very interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International Health Organization.

Percentage of men and women who survived a cancer five years after diagnosis:
U.S.              65%
England        46%
Canada         42%

Percentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who received treatment within six months:
U.S.              93%
England        15%
Canada         43%

Percentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it within six months:
U.S.              90%
England        15%
Canada         43%

Percentage referred to a medical specialist who see one within one month:
U.S.              77%
England        40%
Canada         43%

Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million people:
U.S.              71
England        14
Canada         18

Percentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they are in "excellent health":
U.S.              12%
England          2%
Canada           6%

And Obama has  pushed his illegal  health care idea on all Americans for what?

Why?

and modeled after who?

Check this last set of statistics!!
 

The percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked in the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet.  You know what the private business sector is ... a real life business, not a government job.  Here are the percentages.

T. Roosevelt....... 38%
Taft......................40%
Wilson .................52%
Harding................49%
Coolidge..............48%
Hoover.................42%
F. Roosevelt.........50%
Truman.................50%
Eisenhower...........57%
Kennedy...............30%
Johnson................47%
Nixon................... 53%
Ford..................... 42%
Carter.................. 32%
Reagan..................56%
GH Bush................51%
Clinton  .................39%
GW Bush...............55%
Obama............. 8%


This helps to explain this Obama administration:  only 8% of them have ever worked in private business!

And Obama never has had a real working, producing job and you let him run the country, the budget and our health care?

That's right!  
Only eight percent---the least, by far, of the last 19 presidents!  And these people are trying to tell our big corporations how to run their business?  They know what's best for GM, Chrysler, Wall Street, and you and me?

How can the president of a major nation and society, the one with the most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk about business when he's never worked for one?  Or about jobs when he has never really had one?  And when it's the same for 92% of his senior staff and closest advisers?  They've spent most of their time in academia, government and/or non-profit jobs or as "community organizers".  These people have been a leach on the tax payers of this nation all their lives and that includes Obama who was raised somewhere in a village in ….


Sign up to follow, always short and sweet!

Hope and Change!

Now, today, with the election results in…this is what Obama must have had in mind when he coined the adage.

The American people have spoken, problem is in Nevada and California…so did many Illegal aliens! But, then, that should not be a surprise.

Well, CA and NV have the some of the worst unemployment and out of control spending in the nation thanks to liberals and moderates. Guess they don’t want change and have no hope for it. I can hear their chants now, Long live Prince Harry, Nancy and Barbra 

Below shows how the Republican party, really is the American party and no demonizing by democrats can dismiss this FACT! 

Minorities Ride Republican Wave to Historic Wins

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/11/03/minorities-ride-republican-wave-historic-wins/

....

News from the Heritage Foundation

October 27, 2010 | By Bethany Murphy Heritage's Plan to Reform Congress The midterm elections are now exactly a week away. And these elections could transform the way that government in Washington runs. The Heritage Foundation doesn’t have a dog in any of the election fights. As a non-partisan organization, we are in the unique position of being able to hold members of both parties accountable to uphold conservative values and principles. Heritage has developed a plan that could help make congressmen more accountable to the people that elected them. If enacted, this Heritage proposal would change what elections cannot: how Congress itself is run. A shakeup of Congress’ internal structure could help newly-elected conservatives get a hearing for their ideas. We have four major recommendations that both parties should implement before November 15, when new committee members will be chosen. ·         The steering committee, rather than party leaders, should select all committee chairmen and members. ·         Party leaders should no longer dominate or control the steering committee. This would allow rank-and-file Representatives to nominate and elect the controlling votes on each steering committee. ·         Term limits should apply to all House and party leaders, including the Speaker, as well as to committee chairmen and ranking members. ·         A cap should be placed on the overall size of each committee—such as a 50-member maximum—to avoid scenarios where committees wield a disproportionate amount of influence over the House. “Over the last several decades, legislative branch authority has become overly concentrated into the hands of a few select leaders of the majority party,” Heritage experts Ernest Istook, Matthew Spalding and Michael Franc argue, “rather than the decentralized lawmaking body that is more consistent with its constitutional responsibilities.” What does this mean? Because Congressional leaders often require that their members to vote in a bloc, lobbyists and members of the executive branch only need to convince a few Congressmen of the merits of the bill before it is voted on.  Currently, party leaders choose committee chairmen, who have enormous power to shape legislation. Changing the way committee chairmen are chosen is just one important step in reforming the way that Washington operates on a day-to-day basis. Heritage’s proposal is a useful guide to how the House can be made more responsive to public opinion.  By diluting the authority of party leaders, the reforms could create a less partisan Congress. This, in turn, could allow lawmakers to more easily seek solutions across party lines, as they would be less beholden to party leaders. Bringing fresh faces to Washington may change the appearance of Congress, but structural changes will change Congress’ performance – for the better. > Other Heritage Work of Note Unions—and particularly teachers unions—are notorious for keeping even bad workers on the payroll.   But while bad teaching may not be a good enough reason to fire a teacher, Heritage’s James Sherk reports, political disagreement is enough reason to fire a union worker.  “Duane Hammond . . . had a job helping build a stage for an upcoming Obama rally in Los Angeles,” writes the Heritage labor expert. “His union fired him because he wore a sweatshirt with the name ‘Bush’ on it.” National Public Radio, a supposedly unbiased company that receives government funding, has come under attack for its recent politically-motivated firing of Juan Williams.  Heritage’s Mike Gonzalez examines this situation and concludes: “They present themselves as an objective media organization, but they’re not.”  “In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, they came out by the thousands. They were some of the first on the scene and among the last to leave,” writes James Carafano about the State Defense Forces, groups of state volunteer militia that provide invaluable disaster relief without very much funding.  Because of their low-cost, invaluable assistance, Heritage’s expert on homeland security believes that these forces should be expanded in various states.  “When King George III asked if the colonists could boycott British goods, his solicitor general informed him it was beyond the power of the king to mandate that his subjects buy specific goods like tea,” writes Heritage’s Conn Carroll. Virginia’s Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli compared this to the new mandate to buy health insurance. “The power of the United States government under the Constitution must be smaller than that of King George,” Cuccinelli said. > In Other News To counter perceptions that government officials are lazy and entitled, young federal workers are organizing a “Government Doesn’t Suck March” this coming Saturday in Washington, D.C. In the wake of March's earthquake, an influx of foreign aid has destroyed Haiti's private health care system. With a cholera outbreak outside the capital Port-au-Prince, the effects of that collapse are being felt.  Employers are considering raising the cost of their health care plans or dropping them altogether in response to Obamacare.   French workers have begun to return to work after striking for weeks against government plans to raise the retirement age.  Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez plans to expropriate a U.S. company’s factories. Iran has started to inject uranium into one of its nuclear reactors.  Bethany Murphy is a writer for MyHeritage.org—a website for members and supporters of The Heritage Foundation. Nathaniel Ward; Amanda Reinecker and Andrew Vitaliti, a Heritage intern, contributed to this report.