Justice for Trayvon

Hello. Don’t recognize me? That’s OK; I understand.

My name was Antonio West. I was the 13-month old child who was shot in the face at point blank range by two black teens, who were attempting to rob my mother, who was also shot.

I think my murder and my mommy’s wounding made the news for maybe a day, and then disappeared.

A Grand Jury of my mommy's peers from Brunswick, Georgia ruled the black teens who murdered me will not face the death penalty... too bad it was me who got the death sentence from my killers instead, because Mommy didn’t have the money they demanded.

See, my family made the mistake of being white in a 73% non-white neighborhood, but my murder wasn’t ruled a ‘hate crime’.

Oh, and President Obama didn’t take a single moment to acknowledge my murder. He couldn’t have any children who could possibly look like me - so why should he care?

I’m one of the youngest murder victims in our great Nation's history, but the media didn’t care to cover the story of my being killed in cold blood.

There isn’t a white equivalent of Al Sharpton, because if there was he would be branded a ‘racist’. So no one’s rushing to Brunswick, Georgia to demonstrate and demand ‘justice’ for me. There’s no ‘White Panther’ party, either, to put a bounty on the lives of the two black teens who murdered me.

I have no voice, I have no representation, and unlike those who shot me in the face while I sat innocently in my stroller - I no longer have my life.

Isn’t this a great country?

So while you’re out seeking ‘justice for Trayvon’, please remember to seek ‘justice’ for me. Tell your friends about me, tell your families, get tee-shirts with my face on them, and make the world pay attention, just like you did for Trayvon.

I won’t hold my breath.

I don’t have to anymore.

Understanding how ObamaCare will KILL

By BETSY MCCAUGHEY, The New York Post

The central parts of ObamaCare don’t roll out until 2014, but the wheels are already falling off this clunker. The latest news from four federal agencies is that 1) insurance will be a lot less affordable than Americans were led to expect, 2) fewer people than promised will get insurance and 3) millions of people who have coverage through a job now will lose it, thanks to the president’s “reforms.” Oh, and children are the biggest victims. But, but, but...he said that would never happen and that only the house republicans want to starve and stop children benefits 

The Affordable Care Act is looking less and less affordable.

Start with the IRS’s new estimate for what the cheapest family plan will cost by 2016: $20,000 a year to cover two adults and three kids. And that will only cover 60 percent of medical bills, so add hefty out-of-pocket costs, too. Great! so tell me just how this great Obama Care thing is helping us???

The next surprise is for parents who thought their kids would be covered by an employer. Sloppy wording in the law left that unclear until last week, when the IRS ruled that kids won’t be covered. How can that be? Over 2,600 pages and they couldn't make this clear enough? Wonder what all those pages were about???

Starting in 2014, the law will require employers with 50 or more full-time employees to offer coverage or pay a penalty. “Affordable” coverage, that is — meaning the employee can’t be told to contribute more than 9.5 percent of his salary. For example, a worker earning $40,000 a year cannot be required to pay more than $3.800.

But the law doesn’t specifically mandate family coverage — and now the administration says that won’t be required. WHAT??? what did this Obama care thing do except raise the cost of our health care and screw up 1/6 of our total economy???

You can see why: If the lowest-cost family plan (again, two adults and three kids) is to run a whopping $20,000, and if the employee’s contribution is limited to $3,800, the employer’s tab would be $16,200 — adding about $7.40 an hour to the cost of that employee.  Wow, I guess that small business owners will love this increase in expense huh! Wisely, the IRS announced on Jan. 30 that employers won’t have to pay for dependents.

But the Congressional Budget Office’s much-cited prediction that ObamaCare would leave only 30 million people uninsured by 2016 was based on the assumption that kids would be covered by employers. At the very least, employers insuring their workers for the first time to avoid the penalty are unlikely to do that.

So how will the kids be covered? They won’t. The IRS shocked the law’s advocates by announcing that the insurance exchanges won’t provide subsidies for a child whose parent is covered at work.

Nor will these parents be penalized for not insuring their children — the IRS will kindly consider the kids exempt from the mandate. What? again, how many pages and just what in the world did all those pages cover???

Also exempt are millions of people who’ll stay uninsured because their state is wisely choosing not to loosen Medicaid eligibility.

Some background: Despite President Obama’s promises to help solve the problem of the uninsured by making private health plans more affordable, the law expands coverage mainly by forcing states to loosen their Medicaid eligibility rules. But the Supreme Court ruled that the feds can’t command states in this way.

At first, the CBO said that ruling would only prevent 4 million people from gaining coverage — but more states than it expected are refusing to go along; it could well be 8 million more without coverage.

Oh, and the CBO last week also doubled its previous estimate on how many people will lose the health coverage they now get through work, upping the figure to 8 million by 2016 and 12 million by 2019. Several top consulting firms put the figures even higher. So tell me just why we have to suffer this ObamaCare mess? Why must we destroy the best healthcare system in the world just because Obama wants to put his name in history? I'm pretty sure it will already be there and in 40-50 years, historians will spell it OneBigAssMisstakeAmerica

Stop Shooters from Voting!

I know how to stop the next school shooting, save the children and restore some sanity to America. Adam Lanza, the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooter, was on medication, we now know. So were previous shooters like the two students at Columbine High School in the 1999 Colorado shooting. Medication makes some people go crazy with violence. (did you know that all these shooters have very liberal back grounds and vote democrat?)

There has been a lot of talk these past few days about banning guns. But the idea of banning guns from all the GOOD people -- the sane, law-abiding citizens of America -- is ludicrous. What really makes sense is banning gun purchases and ownership among mentally MEDICATED people.

Yep. If they're on psychiatric meds, they get no guns. But why stop there? Vehicles are very dangerous metal machines, too, and if people on meds are too dangerous to own guns, they should be too dangerous to operate high-velocity rolling chunks of metal (cars and trucks) on public roadways, no?

That's why I say ban all medicated people from operating motor vehicles. Given that there are currently 32,000 deaths each year in America from motor vehicle accidents, we're talking about saving a thousand times the lives of the children in Sandy Hook!

But why stop there? Electing the wrong President can be just as dangerous as operating a motor vehicle or shooting up a school. The wrong President, you see, can drag a nation into deadly wars, just as we've seen with Bush and Obama. So for those people who are too dangerous to own guns, and too dangerous to drive motor vehicles, they should also be declared too dangerous to VOTE.

Voting, obviously, should be conducted only by someone in a clear state of mind, should it not?

And why even stop there? I think we should ban people on psych drugs from becoming members of Congress. After all, Congress is where the most insane people tend to congregate, and probably at least half of them are on mind-altering meds (and brain-numbing cholesterol drugs). No wonder they can't even read the bills they vote on!

Allowing medicated members of Congress to vote on legislation is a lot like allowing medicated, video-game-playing teenagers to own assault rifles. The outcome is sometimes disastrous...

I'm serious...

This article is only partially satire, by the way. If we're going to talk about banning things in America, let's get serious about the altered mental states being caused by psychiatric drugs, and let's get psych drugs to come with warnings and red flags that preclude people who take those drugs from operating firearms, vehicles or voting booths.

Guns, cars and votes should only be commanded by people of sound mind who are NOT subjected to chemical influences. In society today, we don't tolerate people drinking and driving. So why do we tolerate people medicating and voting?

And if there's any effort to ban guns at all, it needs to be concentrated on those medicated individuals who are not of sound mind.

Below is what a doc has to say about drugging your children in school;
"I don’t have a whole lot of choice,” said Dr. Anderson, a pediatrician for many poor families in Cherokee County, north of Atlanta. “We’ve decided as a society that it’s too expensive to modify the kid’s environment. So we have to modify the kid.”

Those kids doing the killing in school...they all are on or have been on drugs to control their behavior.

Want to stop violence in school,  stop creating monsters with drugs!

Racism in America

Chicago Bears head coach Lovie Smith wants African-Americans to “be patient and look into the future,” setting aside any disappointment in President Obama to actively support his campaign for a second term.

“Our future’s looking bright, because I trust the man who’s leading us. And that man is Barack Obama,”  Smith, 53, says in a new Obama campaign Web video to promote the group African-Americans for Obama. What if the group was called Irish-Americans for Cain, what would the media say that implied?

“I have the president’s back, and it’s up to us as African-Americans to show that we have his back also.”

Ninety-six percent of black voters in the latest ABC News-Washington Post poll say they approve of the way Obama has handled his job, while just 3 percent do not. Is this Racist? White people are split on their support but blacks overwhelmingly support Mr. Obama...why is that?

Questions,

Is it Racist to vote for someone because of the color of their skin?

Is it Racist to publicly support one person over another, because of the color of their skin?

Is it Racist to promote and organize one ethnic group to vote against another ethnic group based on skin color?

What if a white coach was publicly supporting Senator Cain over his challenger, Senator Obama because Mr. Cain is white and white people must stick together?

What if that had been said?

Would that be Racist?

Is this man a Racist for not supporting Mr. Obama? 

The Obama Cover Up

SIMPLY AMAZING WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT

Isn't it amazing that, within only one week of Tiger Woods crashing his Escalade, the press found every woman with whom Tiger has had an affair during the last few years? And, they even uncovered

photos, text messages, recorded phone calls, etc.! Furthermore, they not only know the cause of the family fight, but they even know it was a wedge from his golf bag that his wife used to break out thewindows in the Escalade. Not only that, they know which wedge!And, each & every day, they were able to continue to provide America with updates on Tiger's sex rehab stay, his wife's plans for divorce, as well as the dates & tournaments in which he will play.

Now, Barack Hussein Obama has been in office for three years, yet this very same press: ·

Cannot find any of his childhood friends or neighbors;

Or find any of Obama's high school or college classmates;

Or locate any of his college papers or grades;

Or determine how he paid for both a Columbia & a Harvard education;

Or discover which country issued his visa to travel to Pakistan in the 1980's;

Or even find Michelle Obama's Princeton thesis on racism.

They just can't seem to uncover any of this. Yet, the public still trusts that same press to give them the whole truth!

I find that totally amazing, don't you?

Are you curious about our president's background?

Or is it insignificant, in your judgement?

FYI

Some of these have been answered.

WHERE ARE THE GIRLFRIENDS of OBAMA?

I hadn't thought about this - but where are O's past girlfriends - surely he had at least one? No past girl friends popping up anywhere? Strange - strange to the point of being downright weird!
OK, this is just plain old common sense, no political agendas for either side. Just common knowledge for citizens of a country, especially American citizens, who know every little tidbit about every other president (and their wives) that even know that Andrew Jackson's wife smoked a corn cob pipe and was accused of adultery, or that Lincoln never went to school or Kennedy wore a back brace or Truman played the piano.
We are Americans! Our Media vets these things out! We are known for our humanitarian interests and caring for our 'fellow man.' We care, but none of us knows one single humanizing fact about the history of our own president.
Honestly, and this is a personal thing ... but it's bugged me for years that no one who ever dated him ever showed up. Taken his charisma, which caused the women to be drawn to him so obviously during his campaign, looks like some lady would not have missed the opportunity....
We all know about JFK's magnetism, McCain was no monk, Palin's courtship and even her athletic prowess were probed. Biden's aneurisms are no secret. Look at Cheney and Clinton - we all know about their heart problems. How could I have left out Wild Bill before or during the White House?

Nope... not one lady has stepped up and said, "He was soooo shy," or "What a great dancer!"

Now look at the rest of what we know... no classmates, not even the recorder for the Columbia class notes ever heard of him.

Who was the best man at his wedding? Start there. Check for groomsmen. Then get the footage of the graduation ceremony. Has anyone talked to the professors? Isn't it odd that no one is bragging that they knew him or taught him or lived with him.

When did he meet Michele and how? Are there photos? Every president provides the public with all their photos, etc. for their library. What has he released? Nada - other than what was in this so-called biography! And experts who study writing styles, etc. claim it was not O's own words or typical of his speech patterns, etc. Does this make any of you wonder?

Ever wonder why no one ever came forward from Obama's past, saying they knew him, attended school with him, was his friend, etc.? Not one person has ever come forward from his past. This should really be a cause for great concern. Did you see the movie titled, The Manchurian Candidate?

Let's face it. As insignificant as we all are... someone whom we went to school with remembers our name or face... someone remembers we were the clown or the dork or the brain or the quiet one or the bully or something about us.

George Stephanopoulos, ABC News, said the same thing during the 2008 campaign. Even George questions why no one has acknowledged that the president was in their classroom or ate in the same cafeteria or made impromptu speeches on campus. Stephanopoulos was a classmate of Obama at Columbia - class of 1984.
He says he never had a single class with him.
Since he is such a great orator, why doesn't anyone in Obama's college class remember him?

And, why won't he allow Columbia to release his records?
Do you, like millions of others, simply assume all this is explainable - even though no one can?

NOBODY REMEMBERS OBAMA AT COLUMBIA

Looking for evidence of Obama's past, Fox News contacted 400 Columbia University students from the period when Obama claims to have been there, but not one remembers him. For example,Wayne Allyn Root was (like Obama) a political science major at Columbia, who graduated in 1983. In 2008, Root says of Obama, "I don't know a single person at Columbia that knew him, and they all know me. I don't have a single classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at Columbia ... EVER!

Nobody recalls him.

Root adds that he was, "Class of '83 political science, pre-law" and says, "You don't get more exact or closer than that. Never met him in my life, don't know anyone who ever met him."

At our 20th class reunion five years ago, who was asked to be the speaker of the class? Me. No one ever heard of Barack! And five years ago, nobody even knew who he was. The guy who writes the class notes, who's kind of the, as we say in New York, 'the macha' who knows everybody, has yet to find a person, a human who ever met him."

Obama's photograph does not appear in the school's yearbook, and Obama consistently declines requests to talk about his years at Columbia, provide school records, or provide the name of any former classmates or friends while at Columbia.

How can this be?

NOTE: Wayne Allyn Root can easily be verified. He graduated valedictorian from his high school, Thornton-Donovan School , then graduated from Columbia University in 1983 as a Political Science major in the same '83 class in which Barack Hussein Obama states he was.

Some other interesting questions.
Why was Obama's law license inactivated in 2002?
Why was Michelle's law license inactivated by court order?

According to the U.S. Census, there is only one Barack Obama - but 27 Social Security numbers and over 80 aliases.

WHAT!?
The Social Security number he uses now originated in Connecticut, where he is never reported to have lived.
No wonder all his records are sealed!
Please continue sending this out to everyone. Somewhere, someone had to know him in school... before he "reorganized" Chicago and burst upon the scene at the 2004 Democratic Convention and made us swoon with his charm, poise, and speaking pizzazz.

One of the biggest CONS this country has ever seen, and getting away with it. Go watch the movie The Manchurian Candidate, with Lawrence Harvey ! Good movie!

FUNNY HOW HE GETS BY WITH ANYTHING--- AMERICA DOESN'T CHALLENGE HIM!! SO SAD!!

From now thru November 2012 this should be required weekly or at least monthly, reading –
BY ALL WHO VOTE!!!
Did you notice who Obama threatened when he wasn't getting his way on raising the debt ceiling?
He threatened to not pay:

Social Security Retirees,

Military Retirees,

Social Security disability

and

Federal Retirees
Now.. Let this sink in really good -
He did not threaten to stop payments to illegal aliens
He did not threaten to take frivolous benefits such as Internet access away from violent inmates
He did not offer to fire some of the thousands ofunnecessary federal employees that he hired
He did not offer to cut down on his or his wife's frivolous gallivanting around
He did not threaten to not pay the senators and representatives or any of their staff
He did not threaten to take benefits away from welfare recipients
He did not threaten the food stamp programs
He did not threaten to not pay foreign aid
He did not threaten to cut back on anything that involves his base voters. He considers these to be 'economically critical entitlements.'
The list could go on and on. He is in full political re-election mode!
Why are we allowing this person to destroy this wonderful country with his selfishness and his lies?
His type of change is killing our country. He needs to be stopped and only our votes can stop him.
Do not forget about his tactics when it's election time.

Vote Obama out of the Presidency in 2012.
2012 - THE END OF AN ERROR!
Democracy... is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty... is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. -- Benjamin Franklin

This letter was an e-mail, sent to me by a very good friend.

Be a good friend also and send this blog link on!

The Obama Phenomenon

An interesting read from a columnist with Washington Post, NY Post, SF Examiner

Subject: The Obama Phenomenon

August 18, 2011 Obama: The Affirmative Action President By Matt Patterson
(columnist - Washington Post, New York Post, San Francisco Examiner)

Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world's largest economy, direct the world's most powerful military, execute the world's most consequential job?

Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a "community organizer"; a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, so often did he vote "present"); and finally an unaccomplished single term in United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions. He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as legislator.

And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama's "spiritual mentor"; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama's colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?

Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberaldom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass.

Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass -- held to a lower standard -- because of the color of his skin. Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) "non-threatening," all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?

Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon -- affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.

Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don't care if these minority students fail; liberals aren't around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin -- that's affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn't racism, then nothing is. And that is what America did to Obama.

True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois ; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary. What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks?

In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama's oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people -- conservatives included -- ought now to be deeply embarrassed. The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clichés, and that's when he has his teleprompter in front of him; when the              prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth -- it's all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years.

And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence.  But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?

In short: our president is a small and small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in the Oval Office.

But hey, at least we got to feel good about ourselves for a little while.  And really, isn't that all that matters these days?

Obama’s War on America

Obama started this War on America! Started this mob with his hate filled class warfare agenda. He called for it, promoted it, approved it and encouraged it.
He is the President of the “United States of America”. He is a huge mistake, problem is, his war will be hard, if not impossible to stop now. Remember, he is campaigning for re-election. I don’t think his theme is the “unite’er” and I doubt, “hope and change”.
See what he has done!

Oakland Police responded to a late night call that protesters had broken into and occupied a downtown building and set several simultaneous fires," the statement read. "The protesters began hurling rocks, explosives, bottles, and flaming objects at responding officers. Several private and municipal buildings sustained heavy vandalism."

Police battled with protesters in Seattle, Washington and other cities across America.
This is America, yet here we have protest mobs burning cities, shutting down ports, and attacking our police officers.  And as we've reported to you before, one of the more shameful parts of this story is that Democrat politicians have been egging on these violent mobs, in an attempt to stir up the passions of radical leftists, in order to create a counterpoint by the Left against the tea party movement.

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure,

the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy,

its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.."

-- Winston Churchill

These are possibly the 5 best sentences you'll ever read: Unfortunately, most voters don't know this.

1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity, by legislating the wealth out of prosperity.

2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.

3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.

4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.

5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them; and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work, because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.

Can you think of any reason for not sharing this?

A Coil of Rage

 The character of any man is defined by how he treats his mother as the years
 pass .... need I say more about this person below other than there is no
 character, no integrity but there is a ton of attitude and arrogance that
 defines his shallow past and hollow future .... I rest my case..

 I read Obama's book, Audacity of Hope. It was difficult to read considering his attitude toward us and everything American.. Let me add a phrase he used to describe his attitude toward whites. He harbors a "COIL OF RAGE". His words not mine.

 THIS IS OUR PRESIDENT -- HE'S RUNNING AGAIN, YOU KNOW!  Is anyone out there awake?

 Everyone of voting age should read these two books by him:  Don't buy them,
 just get them from the library.

 From Dreams From My Father:

 "I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began
 to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites."

 From Dreams From My Father :

 "I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity
 against my mother's race."

 From Dreams From My Father:

 "There was something about her that made me wary, a little too sure of
 herself, maybe and white."

 From Dreams From My Father:

 "It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty
 to the black masses, to strike out and name names."

 From Dreams From My Father:

 "I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn't speak to my own.
 It was into my father's image, the black man, son of Africa , that I'd
 packed all the attributes I sought in myself: the attributes of Martin and
 Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela."

 And FINALLY ........... and most scary:

 From Audacity of Hope:

 "I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly
 direction."

 If you have never forwarded an e-mail or Blog, now is the time to do so!!! We have
 someone with this mentality running our GREAT nation!

Obama is starting a War on and against  America!!!

Keep your eye on him and don't blink.

 I don't care whether you are a Democrat, a Republican, a Conservative or a
 liberal, be aware of the attitude and character of this sitting President. 

It's All About Me!

USA TODAY reports: Before his speech Tuesday at Eastfield College in Mesquite, Texas, President Obama stopped by an early childhood education laboratory to read to children ages 3 to 5.

Among his reading selections: A book about the presidential dog Bo, including a drawing of the president himself.
Can you say, Narcissist?


Did you know?

In an obvious effort to protect President Barack Obama, a group of congressional Democrats has introduced legislation to create an official process that will allow the commander-in-chief to keep presidential records secret after he leaves office.

Ironically, Obama revoked a similar George W. Bush order in one of his first official acts as president. In 2001 Bush penned an executive order severely limiting public access to his presidential records. Shortly after swearing in, Obama killed it as part of his much-ballyhooed commitment to government transparency. At the time, the new president claimed that he was giving the American people greater access to “historic documents.”

If the Democrats’ proposed measure (Presidential Records Act Amendments of 2011) becomes law, former presidents will be allowed to assert a new “constitutionally based privilege” against disclosing records of their liking. Here is how it would work; the Archivist of the United States would be required to notify the former president, as well as the incumbent, of intentions to make records public. Anything that either the former or current president claims should be kept private won’t be released.  Pretty Cool huh?

Well…he told us all loud and clear that he was “going to fundamentally change America”

(CNSNews.com) - The Obama administration passed another fiscal milestone this week, according to new data released by the Treasury Department. As of the close of business on Oct. 3, the total national debt was $14,837,099,271,196.71—up about $44.8 billion from Sept. 30.

That means that in the less-than-three-years Obama has been in office, the federal debt has increased by $4.212 trillion--more than the total national debt of about $4.1672 trillion accumulated by all 41 U.S. presidents from George Washington through George H.W. Bush combined. Really, really cool huh? Yep, bring on more of that Hope and Change…Bring on Cain and Newt!

Remember he told us all loud and clear that he was “going to fundamentally change America” Well, here is what Obama meant by "Change".

Families were more dependent on government programs than ever last year.
Nearly half, 48.5%, of the population lived in a household that received some type of government benefit in the first quarter of 2010, according to Census data.
I have no idea why the good old USA has such a debt problem, do you?

Well at last, here is some good news;

John Lott has noticed a corollary to his thesis More Guns, Less Crime: more guns, fewer murders.

According to Lott in his article published at Fox News, after Chicago’s and Washington DC’s strict control gun laws were stuck down;

Newly released data for Chicago (Obamas so called home town) shows that, as in Washington, murder and gun crime rates didn’t rise after the bans were eliminated — they plummeted. WHAT??? WHAT DID THEY SAY??? They have fallen much more than the national crime rate. (snip)  In the first six months of this year, there were 14% fewer murders in Chicago compared to the first six months of last year – back when owning handguns was illegal. It was the largest drop in Chicago’s murder rate since the handgun ban went into effect in 1982. Well, imagine that!

In addition to the decrease in murders committed with guns, crimes committed with guns fell more than non-gun crimes. Works for me, see ya :)

Why I really dislike Obama

Because not only is he a compulsive liar, Obama will lie about what others say to gain support for his position. Obama is a despicable person and poor excuse for a man!

President Obama: Ronald Reagan Would Want 'Buffett Rule' from Colin Sumner on Vimeo.

President Obama at a fundraiser (fundraising is what his focus is, and what he does best) in Dallas, Texas on Tuesday: "Now, this notion that folks are inherently selfish, that’s just not true. (BULL! This is his view and it is incorrect! Like it or not, 99% of all people look to take care of themselves and family 1^st. There is nothing wrong with that. You must be able to take care of yourself before you can help anyone else!) But you’ve got to ask them, right? (WHAT?? Obama/Government has to ask them? Ask them what? To contribute to charity? Take care of their ageing parents? To save and put their children through school? To obey our laws, including immigration?  Ask them what???)

People don’t voluntarily pay taxes. (Really? Why not? Are they selfish and just don’t wish to give away their hard earned money?) But if you ask, most wealthy folks here in Dallas or around the country, they’ll tell you, you know what, I want to make sure that I’m doing my share for America to succeed. (For the most part, if these people are wealthy they have created many jobs and it is those jobs and all citizens prosperity is what America needs to succeed!) But somebody has got to ask. (What??? Ask what? Ask if they want to pay more taxes? Anyone that wishes to, can pay as much as they want to the government, all they have to do is send the check. Asking is fine, adding a tax with the threat of the IRS behind it, is not asking, that is demanding!)

"Now, some Republicans in Congress, they’re already dusting off the old -- their old records. (There he goes again, attack the Republicans. Yep, no politics as usual, he is not a divider, he is the Nobel peace prize winning great uniting guy huh?)  “That’s class warfare.” Let me tell you something, 26 years ago -- some of you may have seen this on television, clips have been circulating -- 26 years ago, another President said that some of these tax loopholes, and I quote, “made it possible for millionaires to pay nothing while a bus driver was paying 10 percent of his salary, and that’s crazy. It’s time we stopped it.” That was 26 years ago. You know the name of that President? Ronald Reagan. (yes and he was correct)

"So was that class warfare? (NO, he closed loop holes, just like he said, but did not discourage investment or savings) By the way, taxes are much lower now than they ever were when Ronald Reagan was President. I know a lot of folks have short memories, but I don’t remember Republicans accusing Ronald Reagan of being a socialist (Your tax policy is not what makes you a socialist. It is your redistribution agenda that is un-American, that and your big government/cradle to grave mentality that is socialistic Your agenda MUST and WILL be defeated in 2012)  -- (laughter) (fools follow fools and birds of a feather flock together) -- or engaging in class warfare, because he thought that everybody should do their fair share." (YOU Sir are an A..hole to make this statement. I have never heard, nor have you…President Reagan refer to “their fair share”. To put words or thoughts into a man’s mouth that he would never have said, words that would go against all the man stood for, all  in an effort to make yourself look like the respectable man that Ronald Reagan was. You Sir are despicable, low life political scum…Have I made my opinion of Obama clear?)

Perhaps you should look at the chart below and find a way to tax people that are not paying taxes now or those that are far below the average. Those are the people that have no stake in America s growth. They are the people who vote for you so you can take care of them. Where is their fair share? Why do the only take, generation after generation? Is this the class you wish to grow?

You want fair? Do away with employer with holdings and make everyone write a check at the end of the year for the Taxes they owe! 

Tax refunds are the government SCAM to make people feel good about taxes!

Yep, thought that is what you were thinking about my comments to your speech.

Mad American

10 Poorest Cities in America, thanks to Democrates!

Poorest Cities in America and how did it happen and Do you want to join them?       City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level 1. Detroit , MI 32.5% 2. Buffalo , NY 29.9% 3. Cincinnati , OH 27.8% 4. Cleveland , OH 27.0% 5. Miami , FL 26.9% 5. St. Louis , MO 26.8% 7. El Paso , TX 26.4% 8. Milwaukee , WI 26.2% 9. Philadelphia , PA 25.1% 10. Newark , NJ Below is how you can join the racks of the worst!  24.2%  U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007  What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty rate all have in common?  Detroit, MI    (1st on the poverty rate list)    hasn't  elected a Republican mayor    since 1961 Buffalo, NY (2nd)    hasn't elected one since 1954 Cincinnati, OH - (3rd)...   since 1984 Cleveland, OH - (4th)...  since 1989 Miami, FL - (5th)    has never  had a Republican mayor St. Louis, MO - (6th)...   since 1949 El Paso, TX - (7th)    has never had a Republican mayor Milwaukee , WI - (8th)...   since 1908 Philadelphia, PA - (9th)...   since 1952 Newark, NJ - (10th)...   since 1907. Einstein once said,    'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again    and expecting different results.' It is the poor who habitually elect Democrats ....   yet they are still  POOR.  "You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.    You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.    You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.    You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man    by inciting class hatred.    You cannot build character and courage    by taking away people's initiative and independence.    You cannot help people permanently by doing for them,    what they could and should do for themselves."   Abraham Lincoln Understand?  Obama, Unions, Democrats and Liberals sure don't!