Obama Attacks the Firearm Industry

Georgia  Arms is the fifth largest  retailer of .223 Ammo in  America. They sell 9mm, .45 cal, and .223 cal ammunition.  They normally buy spent brass from  the U.S. Department of Defense.  Spent brass is "one time fired" shell cases that have been used by our Military for training purposes.
       Georgia Arms buys the brass, reconditions it, and then reloads the brass for resale to Law Enforcement, Gun Clubs, Gun Shops, and stores like Wal-Mart.  They normally buy 30,000 pounds of spent brass at a time.
        This week the DoD wrote a letter to the owner of Georgia Arms informing him that from now on the DoD will be demilitarizing the spent brass by shredding it.  It will no longer be available to the ammunition reloaders, unless they buy it in the scrap shredded condition (for which they have no use).
        The shredded brass is now going to be sold by the United States Department of Defense to Communist China as scrap metal, after the U.S. Taxpayer pays for it to be shredded under a DoD contract.  The Department of Defense is offering the brass for sale to Communist China for less money than the American ammunition reloaders have been paying for spent cartridges.  The DoD will expend Public Debt (money borrowed from Communist China) to have the brass shredded, increasing the cost to the U.S. Taxpayer to provide a military strategic metal to our enemy and manufacturing competitor.
      This sure helps the economy doesn't it?  Sell cheaper to Communist China, and do not sell at all to a U.S. business that employs American citizens.  Any political agenda here?  The Obama Administration is blatantly going after the U.S. Firearms Industry and our ammunition!
    The owner of Georgia Arms says that he will have to lay-off at least half of his sixty employees, within sixty to ninety days if the DoD no longer sells spent brass cases to the industry.  Georgia Arms has two to three months of inventory in stock, by summer they will be sold out.
      If the Reloading Industry is required to purchase new manufacture brass cases, the cost of ammunition will seriously increase.
      You can read the information and see the DoD letter to Georgia Arms at the Shootist Site  http://www.theshootist.net/2009/03/dod-ends-sale-of-expended-military.html <http://www.theshootist.net/2009/03/dod-ends-sale-of-expended-military.html>
      If you're not outraged at what the Obama Administration is doing you should be!   With no ammo, you'll have to defend yourself and your home with more primitive weapons than those with which you will be threatened.  Be afraid!  Be very afraid!  Get involved!  It's Our Freedom and Our Country the “Obamanites” are destroying!  Failure to act now could result in ‘No Hope, but Lots of Change’ in the near future!
      Please forward this to other like minded, patriotic people who would rather work for a living than have an all powerful Federal Government oversee our every need (like in Communist China).  Contact your Federal Legislators and put them on notice that U.S. Taxpayers are fed up with saying one thing and doing something completely contradictory!  

Obama, Preparing For Martial Law?

Obama Signs Executive Order Allowing Control Over All US Resources

 On March 16th, President Obama signed a new Executive Order which expands upon a prior order issued in 1950 for Disaster Preparedness, and gives the office of the President complete control over all the resources in the United States in times of war or emergency. Is Obama making preparations for the election? Ok, that was not funny, this is very serious stuff!

The National Defense Resources Preparedness order gives the Executive Branch the power to control and allocate energy, production, transportation, food, and even water resources by decree under the auspices of national defense and national security. The order is not limited to wartime implementation, as one of the order's functions includes the command and control of resources in peacetime determinations. Now this is very scary! “CONTROL of RESOURCES” that is everything, water food and transportation!

Section 101. Purpose. This order delegates authorities and addresses national defense resource policies and programs under the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (the "Act").

(b) assess on an ongoing basis the capability of the domestic industrial and technological base to satisfy requirements in peacetime and times of national emergency, specifically evaluating the availability of the most critical resource and production sources, including subcontractors and suppliers, materials, skilled labor, and professional and technical personnel; - White House

Additionally, each cabinet under the Executive Branch has been given specific powers when the order is executed, and include the absolute control over food, water, and other resource distributions. So there it is in a nut shell. Wonder if the States will have anything to say about this?

Sec. 201. Priorities and Allocations Authorities. (a) The authority of the President conferred by section 101 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071, to require acceptance and priority performance of contracts or orders (other than contracts of employment) to promote the national defense over performance of any other contracts or orders, and to allocate materials, services, and facilities as deemed necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense, is delegated to the following agency heads:

(1) the Secretary of Agriculture with respect to food resources, food resource facilities, livestock resources, veterinary resources, plant health resources, and the domestic distribution of farm equipment and commercial fertilizer; So the government will have control of all this, not just in war time but anytime Mr. Obama feels like it! He can take control of your food and the production of it. Last I heard, that didn’t even work in Russia.

(2) the Secretary of Energy with respect to all forms of energy; All the gas stations and production of fuel!

(3) the Secretary of Health and Human Services with respect to health resources; There will be no health issues then, other than trying to stay alive!

(4) the Secretary of Transportation with respect to all forms of civil transportation; So, all travel…anywhere! For any reason!! You could not even ride away on your horse under this law!!!

(5) the Secretary of Defense with respect to water resources; Now hear this, the military will tell you when and where you can get a drink of water. O-yes, and how much and for who!

(6) the Secretary of Commerce with respect to all other materials, services, and facilities, including construction materials. Better not try to build a shelter in the woods…you can’t run, you can’t hide, you can’t get water or food without permission from Obama! Remember, he is looking out for the little guy

(e) "Food resources" means all commodities and products, (simple, mixed, or compound), or complements to such commodities or products, that are capable of being ingested by either human beings or animals, WHAT!!!!! irrespective of other uses to which such commodities or products may be put, at all stages of processing from the raw commodity to the products thereof in vendible form for human or animal consumption. "Food resources" also means potable water packaged in commercially marketable containers, all starches, sugars, vegetable and animal or marine fats and oils, seed, cotton, hemp, and flax fiber, Obama could take complete control over all this without any WAR reason at all. but does not mean any such material after it loses its identity as an agricultural commodity or agricultural product. What is that? Poop?

Executive Orders created for national defense and national preparedness are not new in American history, but in each instance they brought about a Constitutional crisis that nearly led standing Presidents to hold dictatorial power over the citizenry. During the Civil War, President Lincoln halted freedom of speech and freedom of the press, while at the same time revoking Habeas Corpus and the right to a fair trial under the sixth amendment. OK, so, Civil War…that would be a reason for sure. Is that what Obama is expecting?  During World War I, when Congress refused to grant Woodrow Wilson extended power over resources to help the war effort, he invoked an Executive Order which allowed him complete control over businesses, industry, transportation, food, and other economic policies.

In both cases, it was only after the death of each President that full Constitutional powers were restored to the citizens of the United States. Dang…until death do we part...

The economy of the United States is based on the free flow of resources, energy, and the rights of consumers to buy and sell as they see fit. Any interference in this economic process quickly leads to shortages, rising prices, and civil unrest. The purpose of President Obama signing this new Executive Order is yet unclear, however, it may coincide with information coming out of Israel yesterday that plans for a tactical or strategic strike on Iran are accelerating. Oil prices in Europe rose over $3 a barrel for Brent crude after the Israeli actions, and US oil prices rose $2 for WTI. So, Obama fears a civil war here. With actions like he just took, he may have one soon!

The Obama administration appears to be preparing for a long drawn out war in the Middle East, or at the very least, an expected crisis that will require the need to override Constitutional authority and claim dominion over all resources in the United States under the guise of national defense. With the rise in Disaster Preparedness growing for both individuals and states leading up to yesterday's Executive Order, the mood of the nation points strongly towards some event or disaster that will require massive preparations on a national as well as local scale. I have sent many of you direct e-mails about how the government expects this very thing to happen and how they are not prepared for it. The only thing this order does is take away the rights of Americans to defend and feed their families the best way they can. The EMP scare is very real from a nuke and even from the sun!

All who study the likely hood of such events agrees it is not a matter of if, IT IS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME! 

This last week I visited with a State Rep at a cattleman meeting who gave me this advice, "get and hold onto tangible assets" because he really believes there is a crash coming.

I also spoke with a gun instructor who said "20 years, I give it 20 years" when talking about a full out of control civil war because of the class warfare that is being promoted today.

This is after I posted the blog on the Muslim and EMP issues. Don't stick your head in the sand, start making intelligent preparations! 

Water, Food, Shelter and Ammunition! 

Shake hands in the new year!

A Marine squad was marching north of Fallujah when they came

upon an Iraqi terrorist who was badly injured and unconscious. On the

opposite side of the road was an American Marine in a similar but less

serious state. The Marine was conscious and alert and as first aid was

given to both men, the squad leader asked the injured Marine what had

happened. The Marine reported, "I was heavily armed and moving north

along the highway here, and coming south was a heavily armed

insurgent. We saw each other and both took cover in the ditches along

the road. I yelled to him that Saddam Hussein was a miserable, lowlife

scum bag who got what he deserved. He yelled back that Barack Obama is

a lying, good-for-nothing, left wing Commie who isn't even an

American. So I said that Osama Bin Laden dresses and acts like a

frigid, mean-spirited lesbian! He retaliated by yelling, Oh yeah?

Well, so does Nancy Pelosi!. And, there we were, in the middle of the

road, shaking hands, when a truck hit us.

What has America become?

A Small MICHIGAN NEWSPAPER EDITORIAL..... short and to the point...

Gun control, coming to your state!

California Gov. Jerry Brown's has signed a measure that bans the open carrying of handguns in California. So, how long will it be until your state does the same? Remember, as California goes, so goes the rest of the nation! Is this action against the second amendment? You bet it is! Will the Obama administration defend the constitution and sue California for this attack on citizens rights? I don’t think so, they are to busy suing states that are attempting to stop the support for illegal aliens. You better pray that the NRA fights and wins against this freedom crunching California law.  

The law, AB144, makes it a misdemeanor to carry an exposed and unloaded gun in a public place. Bill Clinton once stated “that depends on what the definition of is, is”. I wonder what the Liberal CA government definition of “Public place” is (your house)? Not to mention that this is clearly a violation of law abiding citizens rights! Now, if the new laws definition is stated correctly, then the Mad American has found a way around this absurdity, Carry a exposed, LOADED GUN! Wear a shirt that states. “My gun, the gun you clearly see on my person, is loaded, ready to fire and I am trained to hit what I aim at!” Now you should comply with the new law because your gun is clearly loaded and not unloaded. “point out the absurdity by being absurd.”

The governor's office made the announcement in a statement early Monday morning Top California law enforcement officials supported the legislation. Hmmm, I can understand their concerns in the crazy state of CA but a law that takes away freedoms from law abiding citizens is against what they are sworn to do and that is to uphold the constitution and protect citizens! All the facts point to and validate, gun restriction measures increase crime! Who has the strictest gun control laws in the nation and who has the most crime committed with fire arms? Welcome to the District of Columba! If you look at the firearms murder rate per 100,000 people, District of Columbia comes out top - with 16 firearms murders per 100,000 man, woman and child in the state. So why does anyone think increasing gun restricting laws prevents crime? All the stats say just the opposite. If you wish to control crime. Make it a law that all citizens are trained in the use of firearms and that every household owns and has readily available, a loaded fire arm at all times!

Gun Ownership Mandatory In Kennesaw, Georgia
Crime Rate Plummets
by Chuck Baldwin
The New American magazine reminds us that March 25th marked the 16th anniversary of Kennesaw, Georgia's ordinance requiring heads of households (with certain exceptions) to keep at least one firearm in their homes.
The city's population grew from around 5,000 in 1980 to 13,000 by 1996 (latest available estimate). Yet there have been only three murders: two with knives (1984 and 1987) and one with a firearm (1997). After the law went into effect in 1982, crime against persons plummeted 74 percent compared to 1981, and fell another 45 percent in 1983 compared to 1982.
And it has stayed impressively low. In addition to nearly non-existent homicide (murders have averaged a mere 0.19 per year), the annual number of armed robberies, residential burglaries, commercial burglaries, and rapes have averaged, respectively, 1.69, 31.63, 19.75, and 2.00 through 1998.
With all the attention that has been heaped upon the lawful possession of firearms lately, you would think that a city that requires gun ownership would be the center of a media feeding frenzy. It isn't. The fact is I can't remember a major media outlet even mentioning Kennesaw. Can you?
The reason is obvious. Kennesaw proves that the presence of firearms actually improves safety and security. This is not the message that the media want us to hear. They want us to believe that guns are evil and are the cause of violence.
The facts tell a different story. What is even more interesting about Kennesaw is that the city's crime rate decreased with the simple knowledge that the entire community was armed. The bad guys didn't force the residents to prove it. Just knowing that residents were armed prompted them to move on to easier targets. Most criminals don't have a death wish.
There have been two occasions in my own family when the presence of a handgun averted potential disaster. In both instances the gun was never aimed at a person and no shot was fired.

The Los Angeles Times reports that Brown said he had "listened to the police chiefs." Given the facts of the matter, are these city dwelling/raised police chiefs stupid or do they wish to increase their budgets by increasing crime? The facts prove that increasing gun control, increases crime. It is demonstrated without a doubt that if your city’s residents own and are trained in firearms, criminals leave and crime is reduced without police intervention!

Supporters say the only person who knows whether the gun is loaded is the person carrying the gun. Dang, maybe the law should make it mandatory that they all carry unloaded guns, then let the criminals find out who is breaking the law... hee hee. Opponents say the bill is one of many assaults on the public's Second Amendment rights.

 Support this Blog by becoming a member and joining this site (FREE on the right side of the blog) and forwarding this to your friends and asking them to do the same. Make your voice heard!

Why I really dislike Obama

Because not only is he a compulsive liar, Obama will lie about what others say to gain support for his position. Obama is a despicable person and poor excuse for a man!

President Obama: Ronald Reagan Would Want 'Buffett Rule' from Colin Sumner on Vimeo.

President Obama at a fundraiser (fundraising is what his focus is, and what he does best) in Dallas, Texas on Tuesday: "Now, this notion that folks are inherently selfish, that’s just not true. (BULL! This is his view and it is incorrect! Like it or not, 99% of all people look to take care of themselves and family 1^st. There is nothing wrong with that. You must be able to take care of yourself before you can help anyone else!) But you’ve got to ask them, right? (WHAT?? Obama/Government has to ask them? Ask them what? To contribute to charity? Take care of their ageing parents? To save and put their children through school? To obey our laws, including immigration?  Ask them what???)

People don’t voluntarily pay taxes. (Really? Why not? Are they selfish and just don’t wish to give away their hard earned money?) But if you ask, most wealthy folks here in Dallas or around the country, they’ll tell you, you know what, I want to make sure that I’m doing my share for America to succeed. (For the most part, if these people are wealthy they have created many jobs and it is those jobs and all citizens prosperity is what America needs to succeed!) But somebody has got to ask. (What??? Ask what? Ask if they want to pay more taxes? Anyone that wishes to, can pay as much as they want to the government, all they have to do is send the check. Asking is fine, adding a tax with the threat of the IRS behind it, is not asking, that is demanding!)

"Now, some Republicans in Congress, they’re already dusting off the old -- their old records. (There he goes again, attack the Republicans. Yep, no politics as usual, he is not a divider, he is the Nobel peace prize winning great uniting guy huh?)  “That’s class warfare.” Let me tell you something, 26 years ago -- some of you may have seen this on television, clips have been circulating -- 26 years ago, another President said that some of these tax loopholes, and I quote, “made it possible for millionaires to pay nothing while a bus driver was paying 10 percent of his salary, and that’s crazy. It’s time we stopped it.” That was 26 years ago. You know the name of that President? Ronald Reagan. (yes and he was correct)

"So was that class warfare? (NO, he closed loop holes, just like he said, but did not discourage investment or savings) By the way, taxes are much lower now than they ever were when Ronald Reagan was President. I know a lot of folks have short memories, but I don’t remember Republicans accusing Ronald Reagan of being a socialist (Your tax policy is not what makes you a socialist. It is your redistribution agenda that is un-American, that and your big government/cradle to grave mentality that is socialistic Your agenda MUST and WILL be defeated in 2012)  -- (laughter) (fools follow fools and birds of a feather flock together) -- or engaging in class warfare, because he thought that everybody should do their fair share." (YOU Sir are an A..hole to make this statement. I have never heard, nor have you…President Reagan refer to “their fair share”. To put words or thoughts into a man’s mouth that he would never have said, words that would go against all the man stood for, all  in an effort to make yourself look like the respectable man that Ronald Reagan was. You Sir are despicable, low life political scum…Have I made my opinion of Obama clear?)

Perhaps you should look at the chart below and find a way to tax people that are not paying taxes now or those that are far below the average. Those are the people that have no stake in America s growth. They are the people who vote for you so you can take care of them. Where is their fair share? Why do the only take, generation after generation? Is this the class you wish to grow?

You want fair? Do away with employer with holdings and make everyone write a check at the end of the year for the Taxes they owe! 

Tax refunds are the government SCAM to make people feel good about taxes!

Yep, thought that is what you were thinking about my comments to your speech.

Mad American

Obama says, Ethics really not my cup of tea

President Barack Obama told an audience of high school students in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday that he was “not always the very best student” and that ethics “would not have made it on the list” of his favorite subjects. What is on this fools mind as he address students? As President of the USA is he promoting un-ethical behavior, or just stating the fact that he has none?

“I was not always the very best student that I could be when I was in high school, and certainly not when I was in middle school,” Obama said, speaking at Benjamin Banneker Academic High School. Yes, yes we know that now don’t we! We don’t know where you went to school, what your grades where or in what county you attend school in for the most part, but we do know that you are a poor excuse for a man. One that is arrogant in your beliefs and one that believes in failed socialistic programs. This must be the outcome of your up bring in a fatherless home. A home that was not in America. A home where as you say, you grew up hearing the Muslim cant. To bad you didn't grow up hearing John Wayne! (Fill your hands you................)

“I did not love every class I took. I wasn’t always paying attention the way I should have,” Yep, the parts about ethics and economics…don’t think leadership was top of the list either but Chicago style, lie, steal and cheat, mentality was certain to be a favorite class of Mr. insane.   Obama said. “I remember when I was in 8th grade I had to take a class called ethics. Now, ethics is about right and wrong, but if you’d ask me what my favorite subject was back in 8th grade, it was basketball. I don’t think ethics would have made it on the list.” We got it Mr. President, you really don’t have to tell us, we see it in your actions, GOT IT.

Good bye Obama

Ex-Obama supporter?

 Bad language but a great interview with rocker Gene Simmons!

Anti-Hunter - Tree Hugger

A woman from Los Angeles , CA who was a tree hugger, a Democrat, and an anti-hunter, purchased a piece of timberland near Colville, WA.
There was a large tree on one of the highest points in the tract.
She wanted a good view of the natural splendor of her land so she started to climb the big tree.
As she neared the top she encountered a spotted owl that attacked her.
In her haste to escape, the woman slid down the tree to the ground and got many splinters in her crotch.

In considerable pain, she hurried to Mt. Carmel ER to see a doctor.
She told him she was an environmentalist, a democrat, and an anti-hunter and how she came to get all the splinters.
The doctor listened to her story with great patience and then told her to go wait in the examining room and he would see if he could help her.  
 
She sat and waited three hours before the doctor reappeared.
The angry woman demanded, "What took you so long?"
He smiled and then told her, "Well, I had to get permits from the Environmental Protection Agency, the Forest Service, and
the Bureau of Land Management before I could remove old-growth timber from a recreational area.
I'm sorry, but they turned me down.

Gun owner arrested, criminal or patriot?

Unbelievable, click on the link below;

N.J. Man in Prison for Buying Guns — Legally

BELOW IS THE BEST WORDED PRO-GUN ARGUMENT I HAVE EVER READ.
Very good article, of course from a Marine !!!!

      As the Supreme Court hears arguments for and against the Chicago, IL Gun Ban, I offer you another stellar example of a letter (written by a Marine),  that places the proper perspective on what a gun means to a civilized society.

           Interesting take and one you don't hear much. . . . . .
Read this eloquent and profound letter and pay close attention to the last paragraph of the letter....

        "The Gun Is Civilization" by Maj. L. Caudill USMC (Ret)

      Human beings only have two ways to deal with one another: reason and force.
      If you want me to do something for you, you have a choice of either convincing me via argument, or force me to do your bidding under threat of force.
      Every human interaction falls into one of those two categories, without exception. Reason or force, that's it.

      In a truly moral and civilized society, people exclusively interact through persuasion.
      Force has no place as a valid method of social interaction, and the only thing that removes force from the menu is the personal firearm, as paradoxical as it may sound to some.

      When I carry a gun, you cannot deal with me by force.
      You have to use reason and try to persuade me, because I have a way to negate your threat or employment of force.

      The gun is the only personal weapon that puts a 100-pound woman on equal footing with a 220-pound mugger, a 75-year old retiree on equal footing with a 19-year old gang banger, and a single guy on equal footing with a carload of drunk guys with baseball bats. The gun removes the disparity in physical strength, size, or numbers between a potential attacker and a defender.

      There are plenty of people who consider the gun as the source of bad force equations.
      These are the people who think that we'd be more civilized if all guns were removed from society, because a firearm makes it easier for a [armed] mugger to do his job.
       That, of course, is only true if the mugger's potential victims are mostly disarmed either by choice or by legislative fiat--it has no validity when most of a mugger's potential marks are armed.

        People who argue for the banning of arms ask for automatic rule by the young, the strong, and the many, and that's the exact opposite of a civilized society. A mugger, even an armed one, can only make a successful living in a society where the state has granted him a force monopoly.

        Then there's the argument that the gun makes confrontations lethal that otherwise would only result in injury.
        This argument is fallacious in several ways. Without guns involved, confrontations are won by the physically superior party inflicting overwhelming injury on the loser.

         People who think that fists, bats, sticks, or stones don't constitute lethal force watch too much TV, where people take beatings and come out of it with a bloody lip at worst.
         The fact that the gun makes lethal force easier works solely in favor of the weaker defender, not the stronger attacker. If both are armed, the field is level.

          The gun is the only weapon that's as lethal in the hands of an octogenarian as it is in the hands of a weight lifter.
          It simply wouldn't work as well as a force equalizer if it wasn't both lethal and easily employable.

          When I carry a gun, I don't do so because I am looking for a fight, but because I'm looking to be left alone.
          The gun at my side means that I cannot be forced, only persuaded. I don't carry it because I'm afraid, but because it enables me to be unafraid. It doesn't limit the actions of those who would interact with me through reason, only the actions of those who would do so by force.
           It removes force from the equation... and that's why carrying a gun is a civilized act.

            By Maj. L. Caudill USMC (Ret.)

So the greatest civilization is one where all citizens are equally armed and can only be persuaded, never forced.  

Help you children and your Nation by sending a clear message, become a member/follower of this Blog!

Voice your opinion below under the comments, and forward this Blog to you friends, gun owner or not!

...

Videos and Obamas Gun Control

Why FEAR Obama and his gun control congress?

 You're sound asleep when you hear A thump outside your bedroom door. Half-awake, and nearly paralyzed with fear, you hear muffled whispers. At least two people have broken into your house and are moving your way. With your heart pumping, you reach down beside your bed and pick up your shotgun. You rack a shell into the chamber, then inch toward the door and open it. In the darkness, you make out two shadows. One holds something that looks like a crowbar. When the intruder brandishes it as if to strike, you raise the shotgun and fire. The blast knocks both thugs to the floor. One writhes and screams while the second man crawls to the front door and lurches outside. As you pick up the telephone to call police, you know you're in trouble. In your country, most guns were outlawed years before, and the few that are privately owned are so stringently regulated as to make them useless. Yours was never registered.

Police arrive and inform you that the second burglar has died. They arrest you for First Degree Murder and Illegal Possession of a Firearm. When you talk to your attorney, he tells you not to worry: authorities will probably plea the case down to manslaughter.

"What kind of sentence will I get?" you ask. "Only ten-to-twelve years," he replies, as if that's nothing. "Behave yourself, and you'll be out in seven." The next day, the shooting is the lead story in the local newspaper. Somehow, you're portrayed as an eccentric vigilante while the two men you shot are represented as choirboys. Their friends and relatives can't find an unkind word to say about them. Buried deep down in the article, authorities acknowledge that both "victims" have been arrested numerous times. But the next day's headline says it all: "Lovable Rogue Son Didn't Deserve to Die. "The thieves have been transformed from career criminals into Robin Hood-type pranksters. As the days wear on, the story takes wings. The national media picks it up, then the international media. The surviving burglar has become a folk hero. Your attorney says the thief is preparing to sue you, and he'll probably win.

The media publishes reports that your home has been burglarized several times in the past and that you've been critical of local police for their lack of effort in apprehending the suspects. After the last break-in, you told your neighbor that you would be prepared next time. The District Attorney uses this to allege that you were lying in wait for the burglars. The charges haven't been reduced, as your lawyer had so confidently predicted.

When you take the stand, your anger at the injustice of it all works against you.

Prosecutors paint a picture of you as a mean, vengeful man. It doesn't take long for the jury to convict you of all charges.

The judge sentences you to life in prison.

This case really happened.

On August 22, 1999, Tony Martin of Emneth, Norfolk, England, killed one burglar and wounded a second.

In April, 2000, he was convicted and is now serving a life term..

How did it become a crime to defend one's own life in the once great British Empire ?

It started with the Pistols Act of 1903.

This seemingly reasonable law forbade selling pistols to minors or felons and established that handgun sales were to be made only to those who had a license.

The Firearms Act of 1920 expanded licensing to include not only handguns but all firearms except shotguns.

Later laws passed in 1953 and 1967 outlawed the carrying of any weapon by private citizens and mandated the registration of all shotguns.
Momentum for total handgun confiscation began in earnest after the Hungerford mass shooting in 1987. Michael Ryan, a mentally disturbed man with a Kalashnikov rifle, walked down the streets shooting everyone he saw.When the smoke cleared, 17 people were dead.

The British public, already de-sensitized by eighty years of "gun control", demanded even tougher restrictions. (The seizure of all privately owned handguns was the objective even though Ryan used a rifle.)

Nine years later, at Dunblane, Scotland, Thomas Hamilton used a semi-automatic weapon to murder 16 children and a teacher at a public school.

For many years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as mentally unstable or worse, criminals. Now the press had a real kook with which to beat up law-abiding gun owners. Day after day, week after week, the media gave up all pretense of objectivity and demanded a total ban on all handguns. The Dunblane Inquiry, a few months later, sealed the fate of the few sidearms still owned by private citizens.

During the years in which the British government incrementally took away most gun rights, the notion that a citizen had the right to armed self-defense came to be seen as vigilantism. Authorities refused to grant gun licenses to people who were threatened, claiming that self-defense was no longer considered a reason to own a gun. Citizens who shot burglars or robbers or rapists were charged while the real criminals were released. Indeed, after the Martin shooting, a police spokesman was quoted as saying, "We cannot have people take the law into their own hands."

All of Martin's neighbors had been robbed numerous times, and several elderly people were severely injured in beatings by young thugs who had no fear of the consequences. Martin himself, a collector of antiques, had seen most of his collection trashed or stolen by burglars.

When the Dunblane Inquiry ended, citizens who owned handguns were given three months to turn them over to local authorities.

Being good British subjects, most people obeyed the law. The few who didn't were visited by police and threatened with ten-year prison sentences if they didn't comply.

Police later bragged that they'd taken nearly 200,000 handguns from private citizens.

How did the authorities know who had handguns?

The guns had been registered and licensed. Kind of like cars. Sound familiar?

WAKE UP AMERICA; THIS IS WHY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS PUT THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN OUR CONSTITUTION.

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms".
Thomas Jefferson

"..It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
--Samuel Adams

"When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe,we shall become as corrupt as Europe" .
Thomas Jefferson

If you think this is important, please send this blog address to your friends and family!

You had better wake up, because your president (Barack Hussein Obama )  is going to do this very same thing over here if he can get it done.

The Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States. The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms.


The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened. Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.

This is not a joke nor a false warning. As sure as government health care WAS forced on us by the Obama administration through unconstituional means, so will gun control.

Read the Article:
U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015

http://www.bluegrassbulletin.com/2010/06/alert-us-reverses-stance-on-gun-control-treaty-.html

And there are stupid people in congress and on the street that will go right along with him.

"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government".
Thomas Jefferson





Be very careful how you vote!



.......